State v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Deficient performance consists of falling below an objective standard of reasonable representation; to prove prejudice, a defendant must demonstrate that, but for counsel's errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”

   6 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Contreras, 89728 (3-27-2008) · State v. Dissell, Unpublished Decision (8-25-2005)

2. “There is no requirement in Ohio for the trial court to interrogate a defendant in order to determine whether he or she is fully apprised of the right to a jury trial. The Criminal Rules and the Revised Code are satisfied by a written waiver, signed by the defendant, filed with the court, and made in open court, after arraignment and opportunity to consult with counsel.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Simpson, 07ap-929 (5-22-2008) · State v. Molla, 07 Ca 140 (10-15-2008)

3. “in cases where the witness-murder specification was present alone or in combination with one other specification, even when substantial mitigation existed.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 156 Ohio St. 3d 85 - State v. Tench · State v. Brownlee