Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 OHIOST3D 384 - State v. Monroe

State v. Monroe’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

194
cited by 194 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 191 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 194 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Roberts (2006), State v. Perez (2009)

1 federal appellate · 191 state decisions

1000200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 194 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In reviewing a record for sufficiency, '[t]he relevant inquiry is whether, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
    30 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Even though an offense may be statutorily defined as a lesser included offense of another, a charge on such lesser included offense is required only where the evidence presented at trial would reasonably support both an acquittal on the crime charged and a conviction upon the lesser included offense.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In making this determination, the trial court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.