Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

105 Ohio St. 3d 418

State v. Haven

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2005

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2005-05-25

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2020

6 state decisions

Relies on State v. Smith

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-05-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1{¶ 1} The Court of Appeals for Wayne County certified the following question to this court: “Can an offender be convicted of a sexually violent predator specification without there being a separate, prior conviction for a sexually violent offense?”

¶2{¶ 2} On the authority of State v. Smith, 104 Ohio St.3d 106, 2004-Ohio-6238, 818 N.E.2d 283, we answer the certified question in the negative. Therefore, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed to the extent it is inconsistent with State v. Smith, appellant’s sexually-violent-predator specification conviction and sentence are vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing consistent with State v. Smith.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.O’Donnell, J., dissents.
/105/ohiost3d/418 · .json · Public domain