Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 Okla. 166 - Sango v. Sango

Sango v. Sango’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 1988
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 1988

10 state decisions

301924193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tobin v. Tobin · Mendenhall v. Walters · Derritt v. Derritt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘■Under section 4969, Revised Laws 1910 (section 50S, Compiled Oklahoma Statutes, 1921), the amount of .an award of alimony to a wife must be reasonable, having due regard to the value of the real and personal estate of the husband at the time of the divorce, and may be made in real or personal property, or both, or in money, and if made in money, the amount awarded must be just and equitable.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.