Arnold v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis
1924
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 1945
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of Bartlesville · Rual Taylor v. Mrs Allie Parker · State Ex Rel. Miller v. Huser · Large v. Large · Taylor v. Parker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. “If a judgment or decree includes a decision of an independent and separable subject-matter or question within, and an independent and separable subject-matter or question beyond, its jurisdiction, the same is valid as to the former and a mere nullity as to the latter, and is not void in toto.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.