Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 Okla. 51 - Patrick v. Siliskis

Patrick v. Siliskis’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 1965
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 1965

10 state decisions

4019231930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sharp v. Pawhuska Ice Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The defendant introduced certain photographs over the objection of the plaintiff, and, if the testimony presented a close question as to the actual facts, the admission of these photographs might give us some concern, as they were taken one year after the accident, and showed an automobile standing by the tree near the gate and a man leaning on the gate. . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.