Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

105 Or. App. 402

State v. Birchard

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 1991

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 1991-01-23

Applies OR 161 § 161.610

Decided 1991-01-23

PER CURIAM

¶1Defendant was charged and convicted in Umatilla County for attempted murder and attempted first degree robbery. At the sentencing on those convictions, the trial court imposed two mandatory minimum five-year sentences for the use of a gun under ORS 161.610. The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing the second “gun minimum.” State v. Haywood, 73 Or App 6, 697 P2d 977 (1985). We agree. See State v. Birchard (A62487), 105 Or App 400, 804 P2d 1224 (1991).

¶2Although the sentences imposed were concurrent and no error was preserved, there may be collateral consequences as a result of imposition of the second five-year minimum. Therefore, we remand for resentencing. State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 800 P2d 259 (1990).

¶3There is no merit in defendant’s other assignments of error.

¶4Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

/105/orapp/402 · .json · Public domain