Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 Pa. Commw. 494 - Campbell v. Commonwealth

105 Pa. Commw. 494 - Campbell v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2002
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2002

10 state decisions

60198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 68 Pa. Commw. 520 - Swank v. Bensalem Township · 344 Pa. Super. 505 - Merritt v. City of Chester · Mindala v. American Motors Corp. · 101 Pa. Commw. 110 - McCLOSKEY v. ABINGTON SD · 98 Pa. Commw. 138 - City of Philadelphia v. Love

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[T]he claimant to recover must establish that the dangerous condition created a reasonably foreseeable risk of the kind of injury which was incurred and that the local agency had actual notice or could reasonably be charged with notice under the circumstances of the dangerous condition at a sufficient time prior to the event to have taken measures to protect against the dangerous condition.” 42 Pa.C.S. §8542(b)(6)(i).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(b) Acts which may impose liability. — The following acts by a local agency or any of its employees may result in the imposition of liability of a local agency: (6) Streets.— (i) A dangerous condition of streets owned by the local agency, ____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.