Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 SO2D 600 - Davis v. Riggle

Davis v. Riggle’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
September 1962
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McCrory v. Kelly · 38 So. 2d 39 - Dehon v. Heidt · Cowley v. Bolander · 37 Wash. 2d 293 - Hanks v. Landert · Goff v. Miami Transit Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Also there was a triable issue as to negligence of the driver Brown. If it is made to appear from the evidence that by request or by. volunteering Brown became the helper.for the wrecker Higgle, and that he was acting, under Biggie’s authority and instructions in the operation, that would justify determination that Brown was then acting as a servant of Higgle. In that status, if Brown’s negligence was established, his negligence would not preclude recovery by plaintiffs, but could be a basis for imposing liability on Riggle, .aside from and in addition to any showing of negligence on the part of Riggle .himself. Cowley v. Bolander, 120 Ohio St. 553 , 166 N.E. 677 ; Hanks v. Landert, 37 Wash.2d 293 , 223 P.2d 443 , 30 A. L. R.2d 1012.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.