Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 SO3D 1193 - Wilson v. Jones

Wilson v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 672 So. 2d 497 - Ex Parte Integon Corp. · Nance by and Through Nance v. Matthews · 882 So. 2d 307 - Ex Parte Perfection Siding, Inc. · Creola Land Dev., Inc. v. Bentbrooke Housing, LLC · Newman v. Savas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'In Alabama a will may be contested in two ways: (1) under § 43-8-190..., before probate , a contest may be instituted in the probate court or (2) under § 43-8-199..., after probate and within six months thereof, a contest may be instituted by filing a complaint in the circuit court of the county in which the will was probated.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.