Kidd v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
July 2016
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte Frith · 570 So. 2d 703 - Newsome v. State · 654 So. 2d 95 - McKinney v. State · 601 So. 2d 210 - Pate v. State · 857 So. 2d 793 - Ex Parte Coulliette
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘ “[a]n issue raised for the first time on appeal is not subject to appellate review because it has not been properly preserved and presented.” Pate v. State, 601 So.2d 210, 213 (Ala.Crim.App.1992). “ ‘[T]o preserve an issue for appellate review, it must be presented to the trial court by a timely and specific motion setting out the specific grounds in support thereof’ ” McKinney v. State, 654 So.2d 95, 99 (Ala.Crim.App.1995) (citation omitted).’ ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Herring v. State · Hulsey v. State““Kidd’s unlawful possession of the firearm contributed to the argument that eventually led to the shooting. Accordingly, he was not entirely free from fault. Therefore, § 13A-3-23(h) imposed a duty to retreat upon Kidd, and the trial court’s jury instruction to that effect was appropriate.” ■”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fuller v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.