Day v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Farnsworth · United States v. Allen · Gonzalez v. State · 564 So. 2d 601 - State v. Cordia · 583 So. 2d 740 - Edwards v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“testimony [gave] rise to at least a reasonable implication that [Spike] had previously been involved in criminal activity, and therefore the admission of this testimony was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“inconceivable that the jury would not have concluded that Day had been involved in prior criminal conduct, and thus the admission of this evidence constituted reversible error”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“from when she had worked in [her] neighborhood as a community police officer”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.