Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 SO3D 385 - Whitfield v. State

Whitfield v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brown v. State · 574 So. 2d 685 - McQuarter v. State · Vielee v. State · 872 So. 2d 711 - Williams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rule does not speak to the timing of the amendment, only that the defendant múst be afforded a fair opportunity to present a defense and not [be] unfairly surprised. This means that the defendant must be afforded due process of law and'be given fair notice of the nature and cause of the accusation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.