Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

105 So. 3d 667

Bergeron v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 30, 2013

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2013-01-30

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2013

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2013-01-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We reverse and remand the trial court’s order denying appellant’s November 20, 2009 postconviction motion. The trial court did not consider or address the merits of fourteen of appellant’s fifteen claims. Appellant, however, failed to timely amend claim five as permitted by the court, and this claim was abandoned. We affirm the trial court’s determination that appellant’s August 27, 2010 motion was not timely filed. We remand this matter for the trial court to consider claims one through four and six through fifteen of appellant’s November 20, 2009 postconviction motion. We express no opinion as to the merits or sufficiency of any of these claims.

¶2Reversed and remanded with directions.

STEVENSON, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
/105/so3d/667 · .json · Public domain