Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 SW3D 137 - Keeter v. State

Keeter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Brady v. State of Maryland · Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · United States v. Bagley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The verdict in this cause is contrary to the law and the evidence. Evidence establishing the defendant’s innocence was withheld by a material prosecution witness. Defendant prays that the Court set aside the judgment of conviction entered in this cause and order a new trial on the merits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Brady claims should fall under Marin 's [6] category one and need not be `preserved' for appellate review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.