Keeter v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Brady v. State of Maryland · Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · United States v. Bagley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The verdict in this cause is contrary to the law and the evidence. Evidence establishing the defendant’s innocence was withheld by a material prosecution witness. Defendant prays that the Court set aside the judgment of conviction entered in this cause and order a new trial on the merits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Keeter v. State“Brady claims should fall under Marin 's [6] category one and need not be `preserved' for appellate review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Moore v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.