Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 SW3D 213 - Norem v. Norem

Norem v. Norem’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 255th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Worford v. Stamper · Parr v. First State Bank of San Diego · Kinsey v. Kinsey · Hursey v. Hursey · Parness v. Parness

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While a suit for dissolution of a marriage is pending and on the motion of a party or on the court’s own motion after notice and hearing, the court may render an appropriate order, including the granting of a temporary injunction for the preservation of the property and protection of the parties as deemed necessary and equitable and including an order directed to one or both parties ... (5) appointing a receiver for the preservation and protection of the property of the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.