¶1 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
¶2 We have re-examined the record in the light of" the appellant’s motion for rehearing and perceive no reason for a change of the view expressed in the original hearing.
¶3 The motion is overruled. Overruled.
105 Tex. Crim. 78
286 S.W 1102
Hash v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided June 16, 1926
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1926-06-16
<p>The opinion states the case.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1956
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1926-06-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →