Ex parte Hoard’s Empirical Analysis
105 U.S. 578 · 1881
Citation profile
35 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 79 later decisions (21 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2011 · most notably Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass'n (1943), City of Indianapolis v. Chase Nat Bank of City of New York (1941)
35 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Railroad Company v. Koontz Railroad Company · Insurance Company v. Comstock · George Ward Richard Call v. Lewis Gregory
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No case can be found, however, in which a mandamus has been used to compel a court to remand a cause after it has once refused a motion to that effect”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ex parte Harding“Jurisdiction h$s been given to the'Qircuit Court to determine whether the. cause is one that ought to be remanded,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ex parte Harding
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.