105 Wis. 2d 425 - Reckner v. Reckner’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently July 2006 · most notably Donald v. Polk County (1988), Schertz v. Waupaca County (1989)
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 81 Wis. 2d 376 - State Ex Rel. Flowers v. Department of Health & Social Services · 66 Wis. 2d 157 - Schwanz v. Teper · 88 Wis. 2d 575 - Mansfield v. Smith · Jarvais v. Moe · Nolop v. Spettel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n issue is barred by collateral estoppel only if it was litigated, determined, and necessary to the decision of the prior proceeding.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“An exempt homestead as defined in s. 990.01(14) selected by an owner and occupied by him or her shall be exempt from execution, from the lien of every judgment... to the amount of $40,000 .... The exemption shall not be impaired by temporary removal with the intention to reoccupy the premises as a homestead nor by the sale of the homestead, but shall extend to the proceeds derived from the sale to an amount not exceeding $40,000, while held, with the intention to procure another homestead with the proceeds, for 2 years.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The Wisconsin homestead exemption statute was enacted pursuant to art. I, sec. 17, of the Wisconsin Constitution, which provides that a debtor’s privilege to enjoy the necessary comforts of life is to be recognized by wholesome laws exempting a reasonable amount of property from seizure or sale for the payment of any debt or liability. The homestead exemption is to be interpreted broadly to protect the homeowner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.