Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 A3D 816 - Frasconi v. Commonwealth

Frasconi v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Nomination of Paulmier · Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DeSimone · LaFarge Corp. v. Com., Ins. Dept. · Keeley v. Commonwealth, State Real Estate Commission · Presbyterian Medical Center v. Department of Public Welfare

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ny final order, decree, decision, determination or ruling by an agency affecting personal or property rights, privileges, immunities, duties, liabilities or obligations of any or all of the parties to the proceeding in which the adjudication is made.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Any person aggrieved by an adjudication of a Commonwealth agency who has a direct interest in such adjudication shall have the right to appeal therefrom to the court vested with jurisdiction of such appeals by or pursuant to Title 42 (relating to judiciary and judicial procedure).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “2 Pa. C.S. § 702 ; see Malehorn v. Dep't of State, Bureau of Commissions, Elections, and Legislation , 106 A.3d 816 , 820 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2015) (noting correspondence is not an adjudication). An”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.