Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

106 Ala. 425

Willis v. Byrne

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1894

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1894-11-15

Tried before the Hon. James T. Jones. The appellant brought an action against William H. Gasque, as probate judge of Baldwin county, to recover the statutory penalty of two hundred dollars for issuing a license of marriage to his (plaintiff’s) daughter, who was a minor under 18 years of age, without having obtained the consent of the plaintiff for issuing said license.

Relies on Jones' Adm'r v. Brooks · Cox's Adm'r v. Whitfield · Fairley v. Davis

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1894-11-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1934

4 state decisions

2018941900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BRICKELL, C. J.

¶1— The consent of a parent or guardian, that a license may be issued for the marriage of a minor, is a consent preceding, or attending the issue of the license. It may be expressed to the judge of probate personally, or communicated to him in writing. Code, § 2315. If it is not in either of these modes expressed, but was in fact given, the statutory penalty is not now recoverable. — Code, § 2319. But it must have been given in point of fact; if it was not given, however the judge of probate may have been misled or deceived as to the fact by others than the parent or guardian, the statutory penalty is recoverable. The judge can readily protect himself, by requiring the consent to be expressed to him personally, or communicated to him in writing. It is his.own fault, or misfortune, if he is *427misled or deceived by information derived from others. It is obvious the circuit court erred in the instructions given the jury, and in the refusal of the instruction requested by the appellant. The errors compel a reversal of the judgment.

¶2The death of the original defendant pending the appeal, operates an abatement of the ca.use of suit. In the absence of express statutory provision, actions for the recovery of statutory penalties — actions which are in their nature penal — do not survive. The death of either party, plaintiff or defendant, is an incurable abatement. — Fairley v. Davis, 6 Ala. 375; Jones v. Brooks, 30 Ala. 588. The cause of action not surviving, the case will not be remanded. — Cox v. Whitfield, 18 Ala. 738.

¶3Reversed.

/106/ala/425 · .json · Public domain