Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 ALA 454 - Senn v. Joseph

Senn v. Joseph’s Empirical Analysis

1894

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
May 2006
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2006

1 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

60189419001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rosenbaum v. State · Robinson v. Murphy · Ex parte Hayes · Harvey v. Thorpe · West, Oliver & Co. v. Ball

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * The statute does not enlarge the duties of an attorney, nor give him authority to compromise the claim of his client, whether liquidated or unliquidated, admitted or controverted. * * *"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.