Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 Ariz. 149 - State v. McAvaney

State v. McAvaney’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 1995
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 1995

12 state decisions

80197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Blankenship

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““However, this Court generally will not interfere with the trial court’s exercise ' of .its discretion in the matter of granting a new trial unless it appears affirmatively that there was an abuse of discretion, or that the trial court acted arbitrarily. State v. Blankenship, 99 Ariz. 60 , 406 P.2d 729 .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.