In Re Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2017
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1301 · 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on Abraham & Straus v. Francis (In Re Francis) · Wiremen's Credit Union, Inc. v. Laska (In Re Laska) · In Re Sandifer · In Re Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(e) On request of a party in interest and after notice and a hearing, the court shall grant relief from the [codebtor] stay with respect to a creditor, to the extent that— (1) as between the debtor and the [co-debtor], such [codebtor] received the consideration for the claim held by such creditor; ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Motes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.