Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 CAL 113 - Ingram v. Colgan

Ingram v. Colgan’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
11
states following
December 1994
most recently cited

2 district · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently December 1994 · most notably Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa Barbara (1933), Heron v. Riley (1930)

2 district · 32 state decisions — followed in 11 states

8018951900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Calder et Wife, v. Bull et Wife. · Lincoln County v. Luning · Thorpe v. Rutland & Burlington Railroad · People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. Brooks · County of Greene v. Daniel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “lacks the first essential to an efficient appropriation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.