Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 CAL 682 - Jameson v. Hayward

Jameson v. Hayward’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
5
states following
May 2006
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently May 2006 · most notably Adams v. Hopkins (1904), 70 Cal. App. 2d 120 - De Roulet v. Mitchel (1945)

7 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

70189519001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Watson v. Dundee Mortgage & Trust Investment Co. · De Uprey v. De Uprey · Morenhout v. Higuera · Bailey v. Richardson · Rumpp v. Gerkens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Equity will prevent or permit a merger as will best subserve the purposes of justice and the actual and just intent of the parties.... In the absence of an expression of intention, if the interest of the person in whom the several estates have united, as shown from all the circumstances, would be best subserved by keeping them separate, the intent to do so will ordinarily be implied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.