← 106 Cal. App. 2d 549 - Etchart v. Pyles

106 Cal. App. 2d 549 - Etchart v. Pyles’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

cited by 18 later decisions

states following

August 1982

most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 1982

6 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roehm v. County of Orange · Teachout v. Bogy · 104 Cal. App. 2d 759 - Saso v. Furtado · Campbell v. Bauer · Fong v. Rossi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

““Defendant directs our attention to section 7.3 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act (added by Stats. 1949, ch. 1348) which provides that no licensee shall enter into any agreement where he pledges a transfer of his license as security for a loan, or as security for the fulfillment of any agreement. This section did not become effective until October 1, 1949. It is not retroactive (Campbell v. Bauer, 104 Cal.App.2d 740, 743 [ 232 P.2d 590 ]) and is not applicable here.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 112 Cal. App. 2d 90 - Pehau v. Stewart
““As the agreement to retransfer as between the parties is not prohibited by the act, and as such agreements must be viewed in the light of the act which makes the transfer of all licenses subject to the discretion of the board, there is nothing illegal in such an agreement, nor is it in any way contrary to public policy.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 112 Cal. App. 2d 90 - Pehau v. Stewart

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.