Williams v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
106 F. 168 · 1901
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 1946
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Singer Manuf'G Co v. June Manuf'G Co · Pillsbury v. Pillsbury Washburn Flour Mills Co. · Pillsbury-Washburn Flour Mills Co. v. Eagle · Fuller v. Huff · Meyer v. Dr. B. L. Bull Vegetable Medicine Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The complainants are entitled, upon proper proof, to compensation to the extent of the invasion.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.