The Anaces’s Empirical Analysis
106 F. 742 · 1901
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1935
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kimberly v. Arms · Davis v. Schwartz · Furrer v. Ferris · City of Cleveland v. Chisholm · The Alijandro v. Wallace
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We have uniformly held that, while the findings of the court on questions of fact can be reviewed, in this court, the conclusion of the District Court on a conflict of evidence is entitled to and treated with great respect.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.