Kurth v. Carr

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 2, 1939.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1939-10-02

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1957

2 counsel of record

Relies on 28 F. Supp. 258 - Ex Parte Kurth

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1939-10-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Hans Kurth and Gunther Habermann, in pro. per.

¶2Ben Harrison, U. S. Atty., and Ralph E. Lazarus, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

¶3Before GARRECHT and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Upon motion of appellee to dismiss appeal for failure of appellants to file record and docket cause,' and appellants consenting thereto, it is ordered that the appeal in this cause, Ex parte Kurth, 28 F.Supp. 258, be dismissed for failure of appellants to file record and docket cause, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate, of this court herein issued forthwith.