Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

106 F.2d 1016

Docket No. 9132.

Scandrett v. Ells

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Sept. 18, 1939.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1939-09-18

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1966

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Ells v. Scandrett

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1939-09-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1A. N. Whitlock, A. J. Laughon, and Thos. H. Maguire, all of Seattle, Wash., and Wm. D. Keeton, of St. Maries, Idaho, for appellants.

¶2W. F. McNaughton, of Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, Therrett Towles, of Spokane, Wash., Carl M. Buell, of St. Maries, Idaho, and J. Ward Arney, of Coeur d’Alen§, Idaho, for appellee.

¶3Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Pursuant to stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and on motion of appellants, ordered appeal herein, 28 F.Supp. 16, dismissed, that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.

/106/f2d/1016 · .json · Public domain