Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 F.2d 22 - In re Radio-Keith-Orpheum Corp.

In re Radio-Keith-Orpheum Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

106 F.2d 22 · 1939

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
November 2009
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2009 · most notably Chateaugay Corporation v. Ltv Corporation Ltv State of New York (1991), 75481 Chicago Milwaukee St Paul Pacific Railroad Company Cmc Heartland Partners (1993)

13 federal appellate · 1 district ·

20019391940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford · Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co. · Metropolitan Life Ins. v. Murel Holding Corp. · Gamble v. Queens County Water Co. · Union Trust Co. of Maryland v. Wagner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'treatment as nearly like that accorded to ordinary unsecured creditors as the circumstances permit[ ]....'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The debentures, it is true, were issued at a heavy discount. But we are referred to no provision of law forbidding the issuance of bonds by corporations at a discount, and the general rule is that corporations may borrow at a discount (citations omitted). In this case the offer of debentures at the discount complained of was made to the debtor’s stockholders. We see no reason to doubt the validity of the debentures for full face value.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.