Hedges v. Bushnell’s Empirical Analysis
106 F.2d 979 · 1939
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably Burchett v. Myers (1953), In re Sandow (1945)
22 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Underhill · Willoughby v. Jamison · International Shoe Co. v. Lewine · Third Nat. Bank v. Schatten · Karger v. Sandler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““... Records need not be so complete that they state in detail all or substantially all of the transactions taking place in the course of the business. It is enough if they sufficiently identify the transactions that intelligent inquiry can be made respecting them.” Hedges v. Bushnell, 106 F.2d 979, 982 (10th Cir. 1939).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to have been justified under all the circumstances of the case”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.