In Re Excel Corporation, Cargill, Incorporated Freddie Franklin Steve Steffe’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2010
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill · Quackenbush California Insurance Commissioner v. Allstate Insurance Co · Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorfer · Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca · Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the district court adversely affected the rights of the defendants by failing to separately determine the jurisdictional premise upon which each stands and the propriety of removal or remand resulting therefrom.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thomas Albarado“A civil action in any State court arising under the workmen's compensation laws of such State may not be removed to any district court of the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thomas Albarado“'to remedy a clear usurpation of power or abuse of discretion.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thomas Albarado
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.