Barton v. Norrod’s Empirical Analysis
106 F.3d 1289 · 1997
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Stemler v. City of Florence (1997), Smoak v. Hall (2006)
13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3182 · 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 4 U.S.C. § 112 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Malley v. Briggs · Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · California v. Sierra Club · Ker v. People of the State of Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not necessary that the very action have been previously held unlawful but, given the preexisting law, the unlawfulness of the conduct must have been apparent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Fjailure to comply with established procedures does not deprive the fugitive of any protected right.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“); Wirth v. Surles, 562 F.2d 319 , 322 (4th Cir. 1977) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.