Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 F.3d 1388 - Medcom Holding Company v. Baxter Travenol Laboratories Inc

Medcom Holding Company v. Baxter Travenol Laboratories Inc’s Empirical Analysis

106 F.3d 1388 · 1997

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
August 2021
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Naeem v. McKesson Drug Co. (2006), In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation (2013)

29 federal appellate · 2 district ·

3601997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Olano · Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc. · Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd. · Pledger v. Medlock · McI Communications Corporation McI v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where the existence of damages is established, 'the evidence need only tend to show a basis for the computation of damages with a fair degree of probability.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “falls within the flexible range of conclusions which can be reasonably supported by facts because the assessment of damages is primarily an issue of fact for jury determination.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to Illinois law for the substantive standard of what evidence would satisfy proof of damages.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.