Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 F.3d 201 - Grundstad v. Ritt

Grundstad v. Ritt’s Empirical Analysis

106 F.3d 201 · 1997

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
6
states following
November 2023
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably Dunn Industrial Group, Inc. v. City of Sugar Creek (2003), Scinto v. Sosin (1998)

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions

1601997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · McCarthy v. Azure · Interocean Shipping Co. v. National Shipping & Trading Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`a non signatory guarantor of an agreement containing an arbitration provision may be bound by the arbitration provision [only] when the particular guaranty explicitly incorporates the underlying agreement by reference.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Guarantors and sureties for the performance of a contract are bound by the arbitration clause in that contract only when they expressly agree to the obligation to arbitrate,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any dispute or controversy arising under this agreement”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.