Ruedlinger v. Jarrett’s Empirical Analysis
106 F.3d 212 · 1997
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2013
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Koelsch v. Beltone Electronics Corp. · Veprinsky v. Fluor Daniel, Inc. · Reed v. Shepard · Eatmon v. Bristol Steel & Iron Works, Inc. · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. CNA Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to discriminate against any of his employees or applicants for employment, for an employment agency, or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining, including on-the-job training programs, to discriminate against any individual, or for a labor organization to discriminate against any member thereof or applicant for membership, because he has opposed any practice made an unlawful employment practice by this subchapter, or because he has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this subchapter. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Owens v. West“impinge[s] on her 'future employment prospects or otherwise ha[s] a nexus to employment'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.