United States v. Rhodenizer’s Empirical Analysis
106 F.3d 222 · 1997
Citation profile
30
cited by 30 later decisions
January 2006
most recently cited
24 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Henderson v. Brown · Robinett v. United States · United States v. Freisinger · United States v. Flores · United States v. Willis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense (the intentional distribution of more than 500 grams of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 ). The district court instructed the jury that in order to convict Mr. Santos of violating 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1), it must find Mr. Santos either used or carried a firearm during and in relation to the charged drug trafficking offense. Although the court did not specifically define”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an abuse of discretion resulting in clear prejudice”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Even reviewing this issue under the plain error standard, there was simply no error in the district court's failure to give an instruction on the meaning of `carries.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.