United States v. Graves’s Empirical Analysis
106 F.3d 342 · 1997
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably United States of America v. Juan Martinez (2002), In re Sealed Case 96-3167 (1998)
12 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Gordon · United States v. Deninno · Barker v. United States · United States v. LeDonne · United States v. Hill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) defendant's assertion of innocence; (2) resulting prejudice to the government; (3) defendant's delay in filing the withdrawal motion; (4) inconvenience to the court; (5) defendant's assistance of counsel; (6) knowledge and voluntariness of the plea; and (7) resulting waste of judicial resources.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(e). The defendant bears the burden of demonstrating a fair and just reason, based on the following considerations:”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“freely allowed and treated with liberality,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.