Public-domain · open source

106 F.3d 390

Docket No. 96-2682.

Hoffmann v. Hoffmann

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Jan. 21, 1997. Decided Feb. 6, 1997.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently February 1997 · most notably David E. Henderson v. Warren Christopher, Secretary of State, United States Department of State John Deutch, Director, the Central Intelligence Agency Dan Glickman, Secretary, the United States Department of Agriculture Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States Robert Rubin, Secretary of the Treasury William Perry, Secretary of Defense Karl Sprick, Executive Secretary Foreign Service Grievance Board Anthony Lake, National Security Advisor Louis Freeh, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, David E. Henderson v. Warren Christopher, Secretary of State, United States Department of State John Deutch, Director, the Central Intelligence Agency Dan Glickman, Secretary, the United States Department of Agriculture Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States Robert Rubin, Secretary of the Treasury William Perry, Secretary of Defense Karl Sprick, Executive Secretary Foreign Service Grievance Board Anthony Lake, National Security Advisor Louis Freeh, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation (1997), Flowers Ginning Company, Incorporated, D/B/A Warren Brothers Gin v. Arma, Incorporated Ritch McCutchen (1997)

41 federal appellate ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96-3031-AMD)

Barbara Hoffmann, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders dismissing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), as amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996, Pub.L.No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321, Appellant's personal injury claim and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hoffmann v. Hoffmann, No. CA-96-3031-AMD (D. Md. Oct. 21 and Nov. 21, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED