Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

106 F.3d 406

Docket No. 95-16871.

Bell

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Nov. 4, 1996.* Decided Nov. 07, 1996.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Relies on Bailey v. Ignacio

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

¶1

Before: NORRIS, KOZINSKI, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges

¶2

ORDER

¶3

We AFFIRM for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, as adopted by the district court. See Order Adopting Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed March 24, 1995.

¶4

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3

/106/f3d/406 · .json · Public domain