Beganovic v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Wainwright v. Witt · Jencks v. United States · Mikhael v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Chun v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“supported by substantial evidence in the record much like any factual determination.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a credibility determination may not be overturned unless the record compels it”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“cogent reasons for his credibility determination”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.