Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 Fla. 348 - Rich v. Hallman

Rich v. Hallman’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
November 1984
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently November 1984 · most notably Warner v. Florida Bank & Trust Co. (1947), 60 So. 2d 627 - Canova v. Florida Nat. Bank of Jacksonville (1952)

2 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

80193219401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Allore v. Jewell · Supervisors v. Kennicott · Nelson v. Brown · Garner v. Bemis · Hutcheson v. Bibb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In view of the age and infirmity of the donor, the confidential relation existing between the donor and the donee, the influence shown to have been exerted over the donor by the friends of the donee and by the donee herself and in view of other facts and circumstances peculiar to this case, we feel impelled to hold that the duty was on the donee to show that the assignment of the note and mortgage brough in question was bona fide and that it was not secured by undue influence, deceit or other improper means.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the degree of proof necessary to invalidate a will is much greater than that required to set aside a gift inter vivos.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.