Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 Fla. 6 - Wilson v. Conner

Wilson v. Conner’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
January 1988
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently January 1988 · most notably St. Petersburg Bank & Trust Co. v. Hamm (1982), Brumick v. Morris (1938)

3 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

120193219401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pervis v. Frink · Sullivan Et Vir v. Thumm Et Ux. · Purvis v. Frink

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “actual amount of money which the lender turns over to the borrower when the note is signed and the loan completed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.