Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 Haw. 102 - Foo v. State

Foo v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2022

9 state decisions

50200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 6 Cal. 4th 367 - People v. McClellan · 25 Cal. 4th 230 - In Re Resendiz · Dan v. State · State v. Okumura · State v. Bollig

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[m]anifestly, a criminal court is in no position to advise on all the ramifications of a guilty plea personal to a defendant. Accordingly, the courts have drawn a distinction between consequences of which the defendant must be advised, those which are "direct", and those of which the defendant need not be advised, "collateral consequences." A direct consequence is one which has a definite, immediate and largely automatic effect on defendant's punishment. Illustrations of collateral consequences are loss of the right to vote or travel abroad, loss of civil service employment, loss of a driver's license, loss of the right to possess firearms or an undesirable discharge from the Armed Services. The failure to warn of such collateral consequences will not warrant vacating a plea because they are peculiar to the individual and generally result from the actions taken by agencies the court does not control.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to a mandatory minimum period of imprisonment without possibility of parole during such period”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Denying Petition Filed October 15, 2019,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.