Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 Idaho 142 - State v. Young

State v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2002
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 2002

3 state decisions

10198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · State v. Urquhart · State v. Bradley · State v. Stoddard · State v. Palin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the state, not he, opened the door by playing the tape.” Id. The state argued that door was opened by Young’s assertion about the victim’s conduct. Id. This Court stated:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “opened the door” by first presenting evidence of the victim’s bad character.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.