Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 Idaho 310 - State v. Camarillo

State v. Camarillo’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2020

7 state decisions

2019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Toohill · State v. Reinke · State v. Nice · State v. McKeehan · State v. Bitz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is also well settled that placing limits beyond which the voir dire examination may not properly go is a matter which rests in the sound discretion of the trial court. State v. Pettit, 33 Idaho 326 , 193 P. 1015 (1920) See also I.C.R. 24. The exercise of such discretion will not be disturbed except for a manifest abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.