Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 Idaho 455 - Andre v. Morrow

Andre v. Morrow’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
7
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably 162 Ohio App. 3d 510 - Groza-Vance v. Vance (2005), J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Commission (1991)

58 state decisions

16019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Milliken v. Meyer · Cromwell v. County of Sac · People of State of New York Halvey v. Halvey · Griffin v. Griffin · Reynolds v. Stockton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where an order of a lower court is correct, but based upon an erroneous theory, the order will be affirmed upon the correct theory.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “There are two aspects to the doctrine of “res judicata.” Under the principle of “res judicata” or claim preclusion, a judgment on the merits in a prior proceeding bars a subsequent lawsuit between the same parties or their privies upon the same cause of action. The doctrine of collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, prevents the relitigation of issues actually litigated and decided in another action, even in connection with a different claim or cause of action between the same parties in any subsequent suit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.