Archer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1886
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently August 2001 · most notably Hauk v. State (1897), Eacock v. State (1907)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Macloon · Tyler v. People · Padgett v. State · Commonwealth v. Andrews · Adams v. . the People
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The actual fact of conspiring may be inferred, as has been said, from circumstances, and the concurring conduct of the defendants need not be directly proved. Any joint action on a material point, or a collocation of independent but cooperative acts, by persons closely associated with each other, is held to be sufficient to enable the jury to infer concurrence of sentiment.” 2 'Whart. Crim. Law (9th ed.) § 1398.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Slater v. State“The prosecution and the trial court based their actions on Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2013 [P. O. § 9391], which provides: “When a public offense has been committed partly in one county and partly in another, or the act or effects constituting or requisite to the consummation of the offense occur in two or more counties, the jurisdiction is in either county. ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ashe““Where the crime is composed of several elements, and a material one exists in either one of two counties, the courts of either county may, under our statute, rightfully take jurisdiction of the entire crime.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sweeney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.